575
edits
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chroniclers guide"
→Adventurers: new section
(→Adventurers: new section) |
|||
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
:Do you guys think it's worth having a separate 'Wiki Rules', or are there not enough Chronicler's for it to matter? The only real rule I can think of off the top of my head is "No Adventurer Pages". | :Do you guys think it's worth having a separate 'Wiki Rules', or are there not enough Chronicler's for it to matter? The only real rule I can think of off the top of my head is "No Adventurer Pages". | ||
: Maybe not even a hard and fast, or strict "Rules" page, but a "guidelines" or "recommendations" listing of some kind on what to edit/add or not? Maybe that's too open-ended... But I'm rather making it up as I go right now :D --[[User:Zarialle|Zarialle]] ([[User talk:Zarialle|talk]]) 00:26, 17 January 2016 (UTC) | : Maybe not even a hard and fast, or strict "Rules" page, but a "guidelines" or "recommendations" listing of some kind on what to edit/add or not? Maybe that's too open-ended... But I'm rather making it up as I go right now :D --[[User:Zarialle|Zarialle]] ([[User talk:Zarialle|talk]]) 00:26, 17 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
== Adventurers == | |||
Drocilla, could you please remove the Adventurer's link from the Navigation Bar? I think it's a bad idea to encourage Chroniclers to make pages about players in Lusternia, regardless of those player's relative notoriety. If there is enough support for the idea, I guess it could be done, but we'd need to keep a really close watch on it, and again: I think it's a bad idea. It would be helpful if the Chroniclers (or some subset of us) had the priv to change the navigation bar, but that's something that has to be changed upstream. --[[User:Enyalida|Enyalida]] ([[User talk:Enyalida|talk]]) 06:31, 20 January 2016 (UTC) | |||