575
edits
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chroniclers guide"
m
→Skill Dumps
m (→Skill Dumps) |
|||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
On the left hand navigation, I noticed, the Newbie Guide is under Skills under Lusternia Basics. Can we move the Newbie Guide to being first? Seems to make more sense to me, but not sure why it was done that way or if it's possible? --[[User:Zarialle|Zarialle]] ([[User talk:Zarialle|talk]]) 19:50, 19 January 2016 (UTC) | On the left hand navigation, I noticed, the Newbie Guide is under Skills under Lusternia Basics. Can we move the Newbie Guide to being first? Seems to make more sense to me, but not sure why it was done that way or if it's possible? --[[User:Zarialle|Zarialle]] ([[User talk:Zarialle|talk]]) 19:50, 19 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
Seeking any/all feedback on the Newbie Guide - I want to add a section explaining Power, but I keep tweaking and adding as I go along and think of things to add. I have also asked a few other "true newbies" who recently joined to see what else they'd want here and there's a decent argument to add more information on third party clients. But, I do not know if this is really appropriate here or how we would even want to give the information since it's all third party stuff. | |||
Also, what is the protocol for updating existing things? I noticed Magnagora's page is rather bare and would it be OK for me to update it or add some more flavour to what is going on here? | |||
Thanks! | |||
--[[User:Zarialle|Zarialle]] ([[User talk:Zarialle|talk]]) 07:49, 1 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
== Planescape == | == Planescape == | ||
| Line 44: | Line 51: | ||
Needed skills: | Needed skills: | ||
Artisan, Bookbinding, Cooking, Enchantment, Tinkering, Spellcraft, Forging, Herbs, Jewelry | Artisan, Bookbinding, Cooking, Enchantment, Tinkering, Spellcraft, Forging, Herbs, Jewelry | ||
Poisons, Tattoos | Poisons, [http://hastebin.com/nokotavibo.vhdl Tattoos] | ||
Acrobatics, Astrology | Acrobatics, Astrology, Cosmic, Celestialism, Harmonics, Dramaturgy, Elementalism, Aeromancy, Aerochemantics, Aquamancy, Aquachemantics, [http://pastebin.com/Q4tJ25Jq Harmony], Hexes, Illusions, Glamours, Phantasms, [http://pastebin.com/WXdEVyEt Kata], Nekotai, Ninjakari, [http://pastebin.com/jFheC9z3 Shofangi], Tahtetso, Music, Loralaria, Shadowbeat, Druidry (the crow parts), Wicca (With Moon and Night fae), Wyrdenwood, Psionics, Psychometabolism, Telekinesis, Telepathy, Rituals, Necromancy, Sacraments, Stealth, Tarot, Moon | ||
'''Trade''' | '''Trade''' | ||
[http://pastebin.com/nkNsuZRE Alchemy/Lorecraft/Brewmeister] | [http://pastebin.com/nkNsuZRE Alchemy/Lorecraft/Brewmeister] | ||
:The other thing we will need is an output of when each skill is learned. You'll probably have to ask Ieptix for that, but in the past I haven't had much trouble getting that data out of anomalies! --[[User:Enyalida|Enyalida]] ([[User talk:Enyalida|talk]]) 01:53, 16 January 2016 (UTC) | :The other thing we will need is an output of when each skill is learned. You'll probably have to ask Ieptix for that, but in the past I haven't had much trouble getting that data out of anomalies! --[[User:Enyalida|Enyalida]] ([[User talk:Enyalida|talk]]) 01:53, 16 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| Line 75: | Line 70: | ||
:Do you guys think it's worth having a separate 'Wiki Rules', or are there not enough Chronicler's for it to matter? The only real rule I can think of off the top of my head is "No Adventurer Pages". | :Do you guys think it's worth having a separate 'Wiki Rules', or are there not enough Chronicler's for it to matter? The only real rule I can think of off the top of my head is "No Adventurer Pages". | ||
: Maybe not even a hard and fast, or strict "Rules" page, but a "guidelines" or "recommendations" listing of some kind on what to edit/add or not? Maybe that's too open-ended... But I'm rather making it up as I go right now :D --[[User:Zarialle|Zarialle]] ([[User talk:Zarialle|talk]]) 00:26, 17 January 2016 (UTC) | : Maybe not even a hard and fast, or strict "Rules" page, but a "guidelines" or "recommendations" listing of some kind on what to edit/add or not? Maybe that's too open-ended... But I'm rather making it up as I go right now :D --[[User:Zarialle|Zarialle]] ([[User talk:Zarialle|talk]]) 00:26, 17 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
: is there a way we could install a fancy editor, like a [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/WYSIWYG_editor WYSIWYG]? I think it would help tremendously with editing and making templates. --[[User:Yarou|Yarou]] ([[User talk:Yarou|talk]]) | |||
== Adventurers == | == Adventurers == | ||
Drocilla, could you please remove the Adventurer's link from the Navigation Bar? I think it's a bad idea to encourage Chroniclers to make pages about players in Lusternia, regardless of those player's relative notoriety. If there is enough support for the idea, I guess it could be done, but we'd need to keep a really close watch on it, and again: I think it's a bad idea. It would be helpful if the Chroniclers (or some subset of us) had the priv to change the navigation bar, but that's something that has to be changed upstream. --[[User:Enyalida|Enyalida]] ([[User talk:Enyalida|talk]]) 06:31, 20 January 2016 (UTC) | Drocilla, could you please remove the Adventurer's link from the Navigation Bar? I think it's a bad idea to encourage Chroniclers to make pages about players in Lusternia, regardless of those player's relative notoriety. If there is enough support for the idea, I guess it could be done, but we'd need to keep a really close watch on it, and again: I think it's a bad idea. It would be helpful if the Chroniclers (or some subset of us) had the priv to change the navigation bar, but that's something that has to be changed upstream. --[[User:Enyalida|Enyalida]] ([[User talk:Enyalida|talk]]) 06:31, 20 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
== Clearing Old Talk == | |||
I think it's worth clearing out or otherwise archiving this page periodically, so that it remains an up to date chronicler chat for new topics. Is that something anyone else thinks is worth doing? My suggestion would be to clear out resolved topics that haven't had any new comments in a month's time. Of course, they could still be read via the page history, by interested parties. --[[User:Enyalida|Enyalida]] ([[User talk:Enyalida|talk]]) 18:07, 26 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
: Agreed, may as well clear things we're done with. History is there if anything has to be retrieved. Go for it if you feel we're done with anything. PS. I'll be home in a few days finally so whatever other info is still needed, I'll be happy to provide. --[[User:Drocilla|Drocilla]] ([[User talk:Drocilla|talk]]) 17:37, 29 January 2016 (UTC) | |||